1936 Norfolk Commemorative Half Dollar Pcgs Ms67-see Store Ww1-ww2 Medals

1936-Norfolk-Commemorative-Half-Dollar-Pcgs-Ms67-see-Store-Ww1-ww2-Medals-01-hpm
1936 Norfolk Commemorative Half Dollar Pcgs Ms67-see Store Ww1-ww2 Medals
1936 Norfolk Commemorative Half Dollar Pcgs Ms67-see Store Ww1-ww2 Medals
1936 Norfolk Commemorative Half Dollar Pcgs Ms67-see Store Ww1-ww2 Medals
1936 Norfolk Commemorative Half Dollar Pcgs Ms67-see Store Ww1-ww2 Medals

1936 Norfolk Commemorative Half Dollar Pcgs Ms67-see Store Ww1-ww2 Medals
PLEASE FOLLOW OUR E BAY STORE. PLEASE READ WHOLE ADD. We do not want your feed back. We want your repeat business. We get by having best prices on the net. 1936 NORFOLK COMMEMORATIVE HALF DOLLAR. COIN US GRADED MS67 BY PCGS. THE ITEM PICTURED IS WHAT YOU WILL RECEIVE. 50 cents 0.50 US dollars. 30.61 mm (1.20 in). 2.15 mm (0.08 in). 1937 (coins bear the date 1936). 25,000 with 13 pieces for the Assay Commission. None, all pieces struck at the Philadelphia Mint. City seal of Norfolk, Virginia. And Marjory Emory Simpson. Norfolk’s ceremonial mace. The Norfolk, Virginia, Bicentennial half dollar is a half dollar. Struck by the United States Bureau of the Mint. In 1937, though it bears the date 1936. The coin commemorates the 200th anniversary of Norfolk. Being designated as a royal borough. And the 100th anniversary of it becoming a city. It was designed by spouses William Marks Simpson. Virginia Senator Carter Glass. Sought legislation for a Norfolk half dollar, but the bill was amended in committee to provide for commemorative medals instead. Unaware of the change, Glass and the bill’s sponsor in the House of Representatives, Absalom W. Shepherded the legislation through Congress. Local authorities in Norfolk did not want medals, and sought an amendment, which passed Congress in June 1937. The legislation required that all coins be dated 1936; thus, there are five dates on the half dollar, none of which are the date of coining, 1937. The Norfolk half dollar is the only U. Coin to depict the British crown, shown on the city’s ceremonial mace, found on the reverse. (“tails” side) of the coin. Much of the area now comprising the city. Was granted by Charles I of England. In 1636 to Adam Thoroughgood. A former indentured servant. Who had risen to become a member of the Virginia House of Burgesses. Thoroughgood recruited 105 people to live on the land, and named the area for his birthplace, the county of Norfolk. Some land was granted to the Willoughby family; this eventually became Norfolk’s downtown. In 1736, Norfolk was granted a charter as a royal borough by George II. And the Lieutenant Governor of Virginia. Presented Norfolk with a ceremonial mace. In 1753, making Norfolk the only American city to have a mace from colonial times. Despite being nearly destroyed during the American Revolutionary War. Norfolk was almost as large a port as New York City by 1790, but its importance declined in the 19th century. It remains home to a major naval base. In the case of the Norfolk half dollar, the responsible group was the Norfolk Advertising Board, Inc. Affiliated with the Norfolk Chamber of Commerce. Introduced a bill for a Norfolk Bicentennial half dollar on May 20, 1936; it was referred to the Committee on Banking and Commerce. The bill was reported back to the Senate by. Of Colorado on June 20. The committee recommended in the report that a medal, not a coin, be issued. They attached a 1935 letter from President. Complaining that commemorative coins of a purely local nature were being authorized by Congress, and recommending that commemorative medals be issued instead. We haven’t quit the fight. We’ve asked an appointment with President Roosevelt for the purpose of discussing the matter and laying Norfolk’s claim squarely before him. We have a right to know why Norfolk has been discriminated against. It’s time for the people of this area to rise up in righteous indignation at this insult to the city. The past session of Congress passed bills and the President signed them authorizing the issuance of fifteen commemorative coins. Is the landing of the Swedes in Delaware of more historical importance than the original land grant for Norfolk county, comprising what is now Norfolk, Princess Anne and Nansemond counties, and embracing what historians recognize as the most historical area in the country? Is the settlement of northern Illinois, commemorated by the Elgin issue, more important than the granting of the royal charter to Norfolk City? Why, after all these commemorative coins had been authorized, should governmental authorities suddenly become so solicitous of their coinage that the Norfolk issue is so mysteriously changed to call for a medal? Something is radically wrong. And it’s time for the people of Norfolk to bring every pressure to bear in an attempt to remove what is in reality a direct insult to the city. June 20, 1936, the final day of the session, was an exceptionally busy day in Congress. After Adams reported the bill back to the Senate. Glass attempted to have it considered by that body, but initially Joseph Guffey. Of Pennsylvania objected, demanding the regular order. Later that day, Glass advised the Senate that Guffey had stated he would not further object, and again asked to have the bill considered. This time it passed without objection or debate, and the title was changed to reflect that medals were to be struck rather than coins. The bill was considered by the House of Representatives later the same day. Of Virginia moved that the House pass it, stating that the bill authorized medals, but when questioned by Robert F. Of Pennsylvania, stated that the bill was for “silver coins”. The House passed the bill without amendment or debate. And it was signed into law by President Roosevelt on the 28th. Such medals would have had no market, as collectors of the day preferred legal tender. Coins, which is what the promoters of the bill wanted, and so no medals were struck. It was at first hoped that the initial bill might be used to authorize coins; when this proved not to be the case, the head of the Norfolk Advertising Board, Franklin E. Turin, was interviewed in the Norfolk Ledger-Dispatch on August 5, and “ripped away the veil of secrecy that has shrouded negotiations and called a spade a spade”. Turin blamed Roosevelt for the mix-up, and stated that Senator Glass had said he had not realized the bill had been changed, nor had Representative Robertson. Senator Glass promised another attempt. Glass reintroduced the bill, this time numbered as S. 4, on January 6, 1937. It was reported back to the Senate on the 16th by Adams with an amendment containing language usual to commemorative coin bills, that the federal government would not be responsible for the expenses of preparing the dies. The Senate passed it without objection on January 19. The bill was transmitted to the House, where it was referred to the Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures. That committee on May 26 reported the bill back, recommending that it pass after being amended, including increasing the authorized mintage from 20,000 to 25,000. The report drew attention to the “unfortunate error” of the previous year, and “that in making this favorable report it is merely helping to correct this oversight”. The House passed the amended bill on June 21 without discussion or dissent. Roosevelt signed the bill, authorizing 25,000 half dollars, on the 28th. Turin, August 5, 1936.
1936 Norfolk Commemorative Half Dollar Pcgs Ms67-see Store Ww1-ww2 Medals

1893 Isabella Quarter PCGS AU-58-SEE STORE WW1-WW2 MEDALS PCGS COINS -CURRENCY

1893-Isabella-Quarter-PCGS-AU-58-SEE-STORE-WW1-WW2-MEDALS-PCGS-COINS-CURRENCY-01-zdm
1893 Isabella Quarter PCGS AU-58-SEE STORE WW1-WW2 MEDALS PCGS COINS -CURRENCY
1893 Isabella Quarter PCGS AU-58-SEE STORE WW1-WW2 MEDALS PCGS COINS -CURRENCY
1893 Isabella Quarter PCGS AU-58-SEE STORE WW1-WW2 MEDALS PCGS COINS -CURRENCY

1893 Isabella Quarter PCGS AU-58-SEE STORE WW1-WW2 MEDALS PCGS COINS -CURRENCY
PLEASE SEE STORE WW1- WW2 MEDALS -STERLING SILVER BADGES – RARE COINS PCGS GRADED /RARE GRADED CURRENCY. PLEASE FOLLOW OUR E BAY STORE. PLEASE READ WHOLE ADD. We do not want your feed back. We want your repeat business. We get by having best prices on the net. Kneeling female with distaff. Symbolizing women’s industry. Barber after a sketch by George T. This 1893 Isabella Quarter is a stunning piece of history from the Philadelphia Mint. Made of silver and struck as a business strike type, this coin has been graded AU 53 by PCGS and features a beautiful Isabella variety. The coin is circulated, adding to its unique. The Isabella quarter or Columbian Exposition quarter was a United States commemorative coin. Congress authorized the piece at the request of the Board of Lady Managers. Of the World’s Columbian Exposition. Depicts the Spanish queen Isabella I of Castile. Who sponsored Columbus’s voyages to the New World. It was designed by Bureau of the Mint. Chief Engraver Charles E. And is the only U. Commemorative of that denomination that was not intended for circulation. The Board of Lady Managers, headed by Chicago socialite Bertha Palmer. Wanted a woman to design the coin and engaged Caroline Peddle. Peddle left the project after disagreements with Mint officials, who then decided to have Barber do the work. The reverse design, showing a kneeling woman spinning flax, with a distaff. In her left hand and a spindle. In her right, symbolizes women’s industry and was based on a sketch by Assistant Engraver George T. The quarter’s design was deprecated in the numismatic. And the quarter was seen as the worse deal. Today, they are popular with collectors and are valued in the hundreds to thousands of dollars, depending on condition. N August 1892, Congress passed an act authorizing the first United States commemorative coin. The event had been authorised by Congress. Two years previously; that legislation created a Board of Lady Managers and a Board of Gentleman Managers to oversee the fair. The Board of Lady Managers was headed by Bertha Palmer. Owned the Palmer House. The leading hotel in Chicago. The decisions of the Lady Managers were often reversed by their male counterparts on controversial matters: for example, Palmer sought to shut the fair’s “Egyptian Girls” dancing show after deeming it obscene. The show was one of the exposition’s few successful moneymakers, and the Lady Managers were overruled by the men. Led the Exposition’s Board of Lady Managers. Authorization for the Board of Lady Managers had been included in the 1890 law giving federal authority for the Exposition at the insistence of women’s advocate, Susan B. Who was determined to show that women could successfully assist in the management of the fair. To that end, the Lady Managers sought a coin to sell in competition with the commemorative half dollar. At the Exposition, which Congress had approved in 1892. Passage of the half dollar legislation had been difficult, and the Lady Managers decided to wait until the next session of Congress to make their request. When the half dollar appeared in November 1892, the Lady Managers considered it inartistic and determined to do better. Palmer wanted the Lady Managers “to have credit of being the authors of the first really beautiful and artistic coin that has ever been issued by the government of the United States”. In January 1893, Palmer approached the House Appropriations Committee. On March 3, 1893, Congress duly passed an act authorising the souvenir coin, which was to be to the specifications of the quarter. Struck for circulation, and with a design to be approved by the Secretary of the Treasury. Total mintage of the special quarter would be limited to 40,000 specimens. Desiring a beautiful coin to sell, Palmer asked artist Kenyon Cox. She was, however, determined to have a woman actually design the coin. She also consulted with Sara Hallowell, who was both the secretary to the fair’s Director of Fine Arts and was helping the Palmers amass a major art collection. Hallowell contacted sculptor Augustus Saint-Gaudens. Who recommended his onetime student, Caroline Peddle, who was already engaged in exposition work, having been commissioned by Tiffany’s. To produce an exhibit. Palmer agreed to have Peddle do the work. After Congress authorized the souvenir quarter, the Director of the Bureau of the Mint. Wrote to Palmer on March 14, 1893. Although he expressed a willingness to have the Lady Managers select the design, Mint Chief Engraver Charles E. Had already urged Leech to keep the design process in-house at the Mint. Palmer replied that the Lady Managers had decided that the quarter would bear a portrait of Isabella I. (in Spain), whose assistance had helped pay for Columbus’s expedition. Palmer indicated that she was consulting artists and suggested that the Mint submit a design for consideration. She also met with Illinois Congressman Allen Durborow. Chairman of the House of Representatives’ Fair Committee and a former colleague of Secretary of the Treasury John G. Palmer suggested to the congressman that he advocate for the Lady Managers with Carlisle and Leech. Palmer, by letter, hired Peddle to do the design work in late March. The chairwoman did not request that Peddle provide the Lady Managers with the design before sending it to the Mint. Palmer informed Carlisle and Leech of her instructions. Carlisle had no objection to a coin being designed by a woman, or to the use of Isabella’s head. The secretary told Palmer that the reverse, with its long inscription, would appear like a business advertising token, and he asked that it be revised. Leech sent a note to Superintendent Bosbyshell informing him that the Lady Managers would likely have an outside sculptor create the obverse and asking him to have Mint Chief Engraver Charles E. Barber create some designs for the reverse for possible use. Obedient to Palmer’s instructions, Peddle sent Leech sketches of a seated Isabella, with the long inscription on the reverse; she hoped the Mint Director would allow her to shorten it. Leech was unhappy with the reverse, and decided that Barber would design that side of the coin. Barber and Bosbyshell wrote to Leech that Isabella’s legs would appear distorted if the seated figure were used and advocated a head in profile. Carlisle agreed, stating that he had only given permission for a head of Isabella. Peddle was informed that Barber would produce the reverse, though the design would be sent to her for approval, and she would have to change her obverse. Meanwhile, Palmer was growing increasingly anxious: with a timeline of two months from design approval to the availability of the actual coins, she feared that the pieces would not be available for sale until well into the fair’s May to October run. Under pressure from all sides, Peddle threatened to quit the project. Writing that she “could not consent to do half of a piece of work”. What finally wore down Peddle’s patience were two letters dated April 7. One, from Leech, asserted his right as Mint director to prescribe coin designs, and told Peddle that the obverse would be a head of Isabella, while the reverse would be based on sketches by a Mint engraver which she would be free to model. The second, from Bosbyshell, imposed the additional requirement that Isabella not wear a crown, which he deemed inappropriate on an American coin. On April 8, 1893, Caroline Peddle withdrew from the project. Following Peddle’s resignation, Leech wrote a conciliatory letter to Palmer, who responded regretting that the three of them had not worked together, rather than at cross-purposes. Palmer had written to suggest an alternative to the inscription reverse: that the coin depict the Women’s Building at the fair. Barber prepared sketches and rejected the idea, stating that the building would appear a mere streak on the coin in the required low relief. Instead, he favored a sketch prepared by Assistant Engraver George T. Showing a kneeling woman spinning flax, with a distaff. Leech was not fully satisfied with the proposal, stating that the juxtaposition of Isabella on the obverse and the Morgan reverse was “too much woman”. Before accepting Morgan’s design, Leech wanted Barber to produce some reverses himself, which the chief engraver did, and Bosbyshell forwarded them to Leech on April 11 and 12. These showed various uses of a heraldic eagle. After considering these efforts, Leech decided on Morgan’s design. And wrote to Palmer accordingly, stating that the distaff is used in art to symbolize patient industry, and especially the industry of women. In response, the Lady Managers suggested the use of the building’s portal, and asked if it was possible to place a living person on the coin. Leech stated that Secretary Carlisle had selected the distaff reverse, and his determination was binding. Bosbyshell informed Leech by letter that Stewart Cullin, curator at the University of Pennsylvania. Possessed a number of medals depicting Isabella, and former general Oliver O. Was engaged in writing a biography of the late queen and possessed likenesses of her. Leech agreed that these men be consulted. Carlisle was reluctant to allow an inscription which made distinctions by sex, such as “Board of Lady Managers”, to appear on the coin, but he eventually agreed to that wording. On April 24, the Mint Director sent Palmer a box containing two plaster models of the obverse, one of Isabella as a young queen, the other showing her more mature. He also informed her that distaff reverse would be used, with the wording agreed to by Carlisle. The obverse models were supposedly made by Barber based on an engraving of Isabella forwarded by Peddle to the Mint at Palmer’s request, but Moran suggests that the period of only a day between receipt of the engraving and completion of the models (during which Barber also attended the funeral of Bosbyshell’s grandson) means that Barber was working on them before that. The Board of Lady Managers on May 5 selected the young queen. The obverse of the Isabella quarter depicts a crowned and richly clothed bust of that Spanish queen. According to art historian Cornelius Vermeule. Barber’s obverse design follow[s] Gilbert Scott’s Victorian Gothic tradition of photographic classicism, best summed up by the groups of continents and the reliefs of famous persons on the Albert Memorial. The reverse depicts a kneeling woman with distaff and spindle. Vermeule traces that imagery to the figure of a young female servant, carved upon the east pediment of the Temple of Zeus. In the 5th century B. The art historian, writing in 1971, noted that nowadays the coin seems charming for its quaintness and its Victorian flavor, a mixture of cold Hellenism and Renaissance romance. Perhaps one of its greatest joys is that none of the customary inscriptions, mottoes and such, appear on it. Numismatic historian Don Taxay. In his study of early U. Commemoratives, dismissed contemporary accounts (such as in the fair’s official book) that Kenyon Cox had provided a design for the quarter; he noted that the artist’s son had strongly denied that his father was involved in the coin’s creation. Taxay deemed the design “commonplace” and “typical of Barber’s style”, stating that “the modeling, though somewhat more highly relieved than on the half dollar, is without distinction”. The American Journal of Numismatics had other criticisms of the quarter. Of its artistic merit, as of the harmony which is reported to have prevailed at the meetings of those [Lady] Managers, perhaps the less said the better; we do not know who designed it, but in this instance, as in the Half Dollar, the contrast between the examples of the numismatic art of the nation, as displayed on the Columbian coins, on the one hand, and the spirited and admirable work of the architects of the [Exposition’s] buildings, on the other, is painful. If these two coins really represent the highest achievements of our medallists and our mints… We might as well despair of its future… We are not ready to admit this to be true.
1893 Isabella Quarter PCGS AU-58-SEE STORE WW1-WW2 MEDALS PCGS COINS -CURRENCY

1946 Iowa Commemorative Half Dollar 50c PCGS MS66 CAC-SEE STORE WW2 MEDALS

1946-Iowa-Commemorative-Half-Dollar-50c-PCGS-MS66-CAC-SEE-STORE-WW2-MEDALS-01-uaxy
1946 Iowa Commemorative Half Dollar 50c PCGS MS66 CAC-SEE STORE WW2 MEDALS
1946 Iowa Commemorative Half Dollar 50c PCGS MS66 CAC-SEE STORE WW2 MEDALS
1946 Iowa Commemorative Half Dollar 50c PCGS MS66 CAC-SEE STORE WW2 MEDALS
1946 Iowa Commemorative Half Dollar 50c PCGS MS66 CAC-SEE STORE WW2 MEDALS
1946 Iowa Commemorative Half Dollar 50c PCGS MS66 CAC-SEE STORE WW2 MEDALS

1946 Iowa Commemorative Half Dollar 50c PCGS MS66 CAC-SEE STORE WW2 MEDALS
PLEASE FOLLOW OUR E BAY STORE. PLEASE READ WHOLE ADD. We do not want your feed back. We want your repeat business. We get by having best prices on the net. 50 cents 0.50 US dollars. 30.61 mm (1.20 in). 2.15 mm (0.08 in). 100,057 (100,000 coins were authorized). None, all pieces struck at the Philadelphia Mint. Since 1936, no new commemorative coins had been approved, as the many abuses and scandals involved with past commemorative coin issues had caused both Congress and then-president Franklin D. To oppose any bills for new commemoratives, especially after a Congressional hearing held on April 15, 1937. However, with Harry S. In office, the state of Iowa was able to get the bill for the Iowa Centennial half dollar passed on August 7, 1946. The bill authorized a minimum of 100,000 coins to be minted. Former mint engraver Adam Pietz was selected by Mint director Nellie Tayloe Ross. To design and sculpt the coin.
1946 Iowa Commemorative Half Dollar 50c PCGS MS66 CAC-SEE STORE WW2 MEDALS